Review & Inclusion Policy

Last updated: 31.03.2026
1. Purpose
This policy outlines the principles and criteria for reviewing and including artists and studios in Ink Archive.
The platform is structured as a curated system of documented contemporary tattoo practice.
Inclusion is based on alignment with defined professional and visual standards.

2. General Principles
Ink Archive evaluates submissions based on:
  • Professional competence
  • Consistency of work
  • Clarity of visual language
  • Technical execution
  • Alignment with contemporary practice
The platform does not operate as an open directory.
Inclusion is selective.

3. Artist Evaluation
Artist submissions are reviewed with consideration of:
  • Quality and consistency of portfolio
  • Control of line, composition and detail
  • Understanding of placement and anatomy
  • Coherence of stylistic direction
  • Professional presentation
Preference is given to practices demonstrating structure, intention and long-term clarity.

4. Studio Evaluation
Studios are evaluated based on:
  • Professional standards and working conditions
  • Consistency of represented artists
  • Clarity of studio direction
  • Organisational structure
  • Alignment with contemporary practices
Studios function as environments that shape and support artistic work.

5. Selection Process
All submissions are reviewed individually.

The process may include:
  • Portfolio assessment
  • Evaluation of public profiles
  • Internal comparison with existing archive standards

Submission does not guarantee inclusion.

6. Editorial Discretion
Ink Archive reserves the right to:
  • Accept or decline any submission
  • Remove or update listings
  • Adjust presentation or categorisation
  • Evolve selection criteria over time
Decisions are made at the sole discretion of the platform.

7. Reapplication
Applicants may submit again after a period of development.
We encourage continuous refinement of practice and presentation.

8. Integrity of the Archive
Ink Archive prioritises:
  • Structured documentation over volume
  • Quality over quantity
  • Long-term relevance over trends
The archive is intended to remain a stable and coherent system.

9. Contact
For questions regarding review and inclusion:
📧 contact@ink-archive.com